1) Read the text
and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct
response. Only one response is correct.
By charting out the typical cognitive development
of children, Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget has heavily influenced how
psychiatrists delineate the progress of juvenile psychological growth.
Beginning in the 1920s and up until his death in 1980, he studied the errors
schoolchildren made on various tests and realised
that children of the same age made the same kinds of reasoning errors. Based on
these recurring patterns, he identified stages in a child’s cognitive
development, beginning from infancy and extending through adulthood.
Essentially, he proposed that there was a common timetable by which children
initially develop simple cognitive skills and gradually refine them into more
abstract ways of thinking. While more recent theories on the matter suggest
that there is more overlap among these stages and that different environments
affect children’s progress, Piaget’s theory was nonetheless extremely important
to initial studies of cognitive development.
The author moots Piaget’s dissertations with
children in order to:
collate his disquisitions with contemporary therapists’.
denote the glitches in his procedures.
designate how he augmented his postulations.
exhibits how Piaget’s hypotheses are pertained.
2) Read the text
and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct
response. Only one response is correct.
Many of the
latest scientific accomplishments fall in the realm of “pure” science. This is
research for the sake of increasing man’s knowledge without concern about how
the knowledge is going to be used. In contrast with pure science is “applied”
science. The production of synthetic diamonds is an example of applied science.
In applied science the facts and principles of pure science are used in the
solution of a problem which has or will have immediate economic and social importance.
Often in the past, applied science has gone far ahead of pure science. Its
practical applications have been used for man’s good even before the basic
facts and principles were understood. For example, the telegraph, telephone and
electric motor, which could not work without electrons, were invented before
man discovered the electron. People were vaccinated long before viruses were
investigated. Chemicals like sulfuric acid and soda were manufactured long
before man began to understand the nature of the atom. Today, however, if
applied science is to grow it must depend more and more on increased knowledge
of pure science.
In
the past, applied science went far ahead of pure science because:
Pure
science has been discovered only in recent years
Men
understood the basic facts and principles of pure science before they
discovered and invented things.
Pure
science had been considered less important than applied science.
Many
inventions and discoveries had been made before men knew the basic scientific
theories.
3) Read the text and answer the
multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one
response is correct.
Like any work whose popularity outlives its own
time, Gullivers’ Travels can be profitably and
pleasurably read in a variety of ways by a great variety of readers. In modern
times, by readers habituated to the predominant fictional form of the twentieth
century, it has often been read as a kind of novel. In this reading, Gulliver
is the central character, and we follow his exploits on his four voyages with
an interest in his experience, his achievements, his development and his
survival.
What
does the author imply about?
There
is a great variety of readers can get benefits from the popularity of Gulliver’s
work.
Due to
a predominant fictional form of the temporary time, the work has been read as a
kind of novel.
Readers
are expected to enjoy following Gulliver’s travelling stories as he is the main
character of the book.
The
ways of reading the Gullivers’ Travels can be
pleasurable and beneficial to different types of readers.
4) Read the text and answer the multiple-choice
question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is
correct.
We welcome the generalization by Del Giudice of our model investigating the evolvability
conditions for predictive adaptive responses (PARs) in long-lived species like
humans. In our original approach, environmental conditions in 1 year were modelled as the sum of the conditions in the previous year
plus a perturbation term to represent exogenous sources of change. The
perturbation terms were independent from year to year. If the exogenous
perturbation forces are themselves temporally autocorrelated,
then environmental change is described by a more complex autoregressive
structure than the one used in our original model, one in which conditions in
the current year are influenced by conditions in the previous year and the one
before that. Del Giudice shows that when dependencies
between successive years take this more complex form, the present becomes in
effect a better guide to the future than it would otherwise have been. This
makes the external PAR (using conditions experienced early in ontogeny as a
guide to the likely adult external environment) an adaptive strategy under a
somewhat wider range of conditions that those we originally reported.
According
to the text, what is the correct idea that Del Giudice
indicates in his study?
Environmental conditions in 1 year is considered as the sum
of the following year conditions.
Environmental
change is indicated as a complex structure that is less effective than the
original model.
The
external predictive adaptive responses can be suitable strategies under some
conditions.
The
perturbation terms were to present exogenous sources of change which can
dependently change over years.